X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |
|
Recent Comments by imstellar28
 | comment listing type: Top Sift for Mar 22nd, 2010Friends O' the Sift News:New Contest Starting Up In the New Year, Stay tuned for the winners of 2007! Sifter of the Month: [TBA] Post of the Month: [TBA] Top New Animation Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Animation Sifters of All Time Top 15 Animation Sifters of the Past Week 3. Psychologic
(40 votes) 5. jreinisch
(30 votes) 7. Playinwithfire
(12 votes) 15. BoneRemake
(6 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments          |
Speed Riding - Antoine Montant - Can't Stop
You wouldn't expect a dog fight to be this funny
Booby-trapped bike teaches thief a lesson!
Riding a shitty bike with soapy handlebars and direct-drive isn't illegal. Neither is leaving a bike against a building so this discussion is so mind boggling retarded I can't believe it generated so many responses.
I can understand the wacko socialists having their moral compass on backwards, but longde you are a pretty reasonable guy, why the defense of this?
Jon Stewart investigates Chatroulette
Chivalry? (Blog Entry by blankfist)
The problem in this situation is these women think all men want to court them at all times...hence the pompous sense of entitlement and selfish attitude they project towards men. I'd put them in the same group as the feminists who complain about guys opening doors for them - the "people I don't want to date" group.
>> ^peggedbea:
chivalry:
what remains of it, for the most part, is part of the courting ritual.
...
i'm sorry you have bitchy, attractive, spoiled neighbors. but chivalry and feminism aren't the issue.
Even Friedrich Hayek Supported Universal Healthcare (Politics Talk Post)
>> ^Stormsinger:
Care to address the actual subject, or just trolling again? Silly question, I know...
>> ^imstellar28:
Why don't you try actually reading the book, or heck, any book for that matter?
Evolution for IDiots
Just curious.
Even Friedrich Hayek Supported Universal Healthcare (Politics Talk Post)
Holy Grail of Energy?
Even Friedrich Hayek Supported Universal Healthcare (Politics Talk Post)
Capitalism & Communism : the worst of both worlds (Blog Entry by jwray)
>> ^dag:
As usual the "Middle Path" is the way to go. Siddhartha figured that out thousands of years ago and so have countries like Sweden and France. Not being afraid to pragmatically choose the best bits from many differnt "isms" is the way to go. I hope my home country figures this out before it dissolves.
Capitalism & Communism : the worst of both worlds (Blog Entry by jwray)
Also, Human nature is the cause of stupid. No matter how you look at it half of society will always be stupid (bell curve)...until we genetically engineer ourselves into perfect clones, that is.
Suicide Note of Texas Pilot Who Crashed Into IRS Building (Fear Talk Post)
Plane attack victim's son speaks
If you are paid with blood money, well I think you could make an argument that yeah, you aren't that innocent. Still doesn't mean you deserve to die in a plane crash...
>> ^longde:
What about the families of the employees of those evil institutions?
Plane attack victim's son speaks
...but it ain't freedom without the choice to be free.
>> ^kagenin:
Freedom isn't free.
Maybe I'm being too technical, but I'm not condoning this guy flying a plane into a building; I'm merely stating that IRS employees are not innocent. Why are people downvoting - because anything remotely supportive of this guy is immediately wrong, or because they think IRS employees are in fact innocent? From my perspective, you lose your innocence when you commit violence against others. I happen to believe that the IRS uses violence against others in order to relinquish a very large portion of their wages. Maybe you don't agree, and maybe you should support your position. It doesn't mean they deserve to die via airplane. Why not state, "its not brave to fly your plane into a building of people" instead of insinuating the people in question are innocent little white-clothed devout newborn babies, as if flying your plane into a building of murderers would have been heroic? Again, maybe thats too technical for this community?
Its ignorant to think that all civilians are innocent regardless of occupation. Is a police officer enforcing drug laws innocent? Is a lawyer defending a knowingly guilty man innocent? How about a doctor prescribing drugs he knows have serious, if not lethal, side effects? Do any of these people deserve to die instantly via a plane crash? Of course not, which is why I never suggested that. I'm sorry but I can't take the time to explain every nuance of every position I take. I post what I think, nothing more. Why is anyone making assumptions outside of what is explicitly stated?
>> ^kagenin:
Before people say "IRS employees aren't innocent (or people)," let me remind you that the IRS was not the only tenant in the building this nutjob decided to fly his plane into.